The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. 'No refs' is an extremely poor rationale for deletion. There are plenty of articles that cover the subject found from a Google News search. The article can and should be improved rather than deleted.--Michig (talk) 10:08, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. Lot of awards but I do not know if any cover national or international ones as they would then represent notability. General article structure and wording should be improved. --CrossTempleJay → talk16:08, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete without prejudice. The last version of this article without the copyright problems is this one. However, it's an unsourced stub that talks more about the show then the subject. This should be deleted with leave to write a new sourced article which won't be subject to CSD G4. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:40, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.