The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. The original nomination's premise was rebutted, and there is no consensus that the article should be deleted. A merge or redirect could be appropriate, but that is a matter left to the normal editting process. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 13:07, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ga-ga[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clear-cut case of WP:MADEUP. –Chase (talk) 21:35, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete seems interesting but unless proof from significant sources can be provided about its worthiness of inclusion on Wikipedia it should not remain as a Wikipedia entry.--Brave Dragon 22:21, 1 September 2010 (UTC)This user is blocked as a sock puppet of a banned user — Gavia immer (talk) 04:02, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Not made up but I leave the notability determination to others. Ga-ga (Israeli dodgeball) in the news: [1]; books that mention include: [2], [3]; web site with rules (probably not WP:RS but I was wondering): [4]. Abby Kelleyite (talk) 23:00, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. Certainly exists, and certainly is extremely popular among the summer camp crowd, discoverable upon doing the right search, and probably is likely to become more notable rather than less as it spreads, but I'm not passionate about its currently meeting our usual notability standards.keɪɑtɪk flʌfi (talk) 23:49, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and improve. It's definitely a thing, and the games category contains plenty of games of equal or lesser notability. The article really needs better citations though. Roscelese (talk) 22:26, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I'm seeing a whole lot of proof that this game exists, but very little that tells me any more than that.--Shirt58 (talk) 08:35, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and Cleanup / Improve references. The references mentioned above should be incorporated, it also needs to be wikified, and original research removed. Finally, I will mention the other option would be to delete and redirect to List of dodgeball variations#Ga-ga, which also needs references. Danski14^(talk) 17:59, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.