The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ff m 18:09, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Galaxy (video game)[edit]

Article has already been deleted once, no changes have been made to the article since being restored, notability is unclear. HollyHuntaway (talk) 23:07, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I'm working on it; the article was restored minutes ago. The nominee is a supposed newbie who placed prod or prod2 tags on a variety of articles in 24 hours in the past week. Bearian (talk) 23:31, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree, because said user was involved in the article a while ago. However, it was deleted per WP:PROD, so G4 doesn't apply. MuZemike 05:21, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 23:42, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. We need reliable third party sources of notability of this game or this article will be a good candidate of deletion. Zero Kitsune (talk) 00:31, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not a notable game CTJF83Talk 06:45, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to lack of third-party sourcing. Stifle (talk) 23:28, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ L'Aquatique[talk] 09:19, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Needs independent sources and I'd question the notability of the game. MvjsTalking 09:58, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no reliable third-party sources, thus failing WP:V and WP:N. Current sources are either unreliable or non-independent. Randomran (talk) 03:57, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I can not locate any better sources. I made an effort. Bearian (talk) 19:30, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per lack of verifiable, third-party sources establishing notability for this game. The forecast also calls for WP:SNOW. MuZemike (talk) 16:27, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Non-notable game, with no verifiable sources. Tatarian (talk) 17:43, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.