The result was Speedy Keep - Nomination withdrawn, Dontexpect (talk) 11:12, 14 July 2009 (Signature & time/date stamp added -SpacemanSpiffCalvin‡Hobbes 14:58, 14 July 2009 (UTC))[reply]
Article mentions subject's qualifications and quotes from government officials, but fails to provide any sources or external links for this information. Additionally, the article, particularly sentences such as: "Aruna Kumari is known for her sincerity, honesty and determination in politics like her father" strike me as being in clear violation of WP:NPOV as the subject is apparently an elected official.
Author has edited the article numerous times in response to flagging but has yet to improve the readibilty, grammar, or organisation of the page to a degree that would shed light on the importance of the subject. Edits have consisted of adding additional, irrelevant, details about the subject's life instead of condensing and clarifying. Dontexpect (talk) 14:35, 13 July 2009
Per WP:GNG "Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material." Although your second article focuses on Ms Kumari, the first merely lists her name at the end of the piece, not explaining her relevance to the issue at hand. Politicians do fall under notability criteria WP:POLITICIAN, but "Just being an elected local official...does not guarantee notability."--Dontexpect (talk) 15:09, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]