The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-11 04:08Z

Gavmo[edit]

Gavmo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Not encyclopedic, no sources given. At best transwikiable to Wikionary Jvhertum 15:45, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as a protologism: it's not in Google's dictionary of the English language. YechielMan 16:54, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Smells of neologism. Down the /dev/null with it. Anthony Appleyard 17:01, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete this is just made up bollocks. no ghits except for Myspace, Livejournal usernames etc. Totnesmartin 20:01, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - sounds like a load of crap to me, cant find it in any dictionarys. Probably just some kid making up his own little word TSMonk 13:17, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.