The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 11:37, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

George Back (actor)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Oops meant to do a xfd well this is what I put: Actor with no reliable sources at all as well as really no notable roles-outside of Horrible Bosses if that really counts here. Wgolf (talk) 22:43, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:53, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:53, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- He's got 3 nontrival movies, ~~IMDB does count as a reference~~. -- IamM1rv (talk) 12:29, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@IamM1rv: The IMDb is not a reliable source, and it is specifically called out out in WP:RS as an example of a user-generated source. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:50, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lol, I'm going to have to go back and have words with someone who misrepresented this after reading that again! -- IamM1rv (talk) 14:18, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ Still, I was also told for common knowledge things that aren't disputed references weren't needed - like example - three major movies. Look at it this way ... are all actors notable, no. Are actors who made it into a major budget movie ... probably. What about 3 major budget movies? IamM1rv (talk) 15:17, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You can't vote twice-sorry. Also his other roles are pretty minor. Wgolf (talk) 15:20, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Struck duplicate !vote above. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:56, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 16:53, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Simply being in three non-trivial, big-budget movies does not satisfy WP:NACTOR, which requires significant roles. If we're being really, really charitable, he has maybe a fraction of one, plus the TV series. Not enough, as shown by the lack of press coverage. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:24, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly-might as well as include Peter Jacksons kids on Wikipedia if you would do that-they were in all the Lord of the Rings films and all the Hobbit films. Wgolf (talk) 21:21, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I've created an article for George Back at WikiPeeps So any editors interested in working on this content could go there. As far as notability in the Encyclopedic sense I think George is just another actor, talented at plying their trade but not notable. Bryce Carmony (talk) 02:44, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.