The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Stifle (talk) 13:49, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Georgi Adamia[edit]

Georgi Adamia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The last afd failed to reach consensus, I think largely due to assumptions of bad faith by several editors. Given that six other afd's on similar footballers just resulted in deletions without objection, I have every reason to believe consensus is now possible. (see Emin Amiraslanov, Amil Agajanov, Samir Abdulov, Asif Abbasov, Orkhan Mirzaev, and Javad Mirzaev (2nd nomination)). In any case, the underlying notability problems remain. He has not played in a league confirmed to be fully professional or for his country's national team, nor has he received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:36, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  B </sup8>E C K Y S A Y L E 21:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 21:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 21:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 21:47, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
And the assumptions of bad faith begin anew... This is not North Korea or Somalia we're talking about. Internet access is readily available in Georgia and Azerbaijan, and the local press take full advantage of it. And yet, through two afd's now, no one has provided any evidence that he has received significant coverage from them, or anywhere else for that matter, without which this article fails both relevant notability guidelines. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:52, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I quite agree. A group of editors inability to read a given language does not mean notability should be assumed and it certainly isn't biased by default. Fenix down (talk) 20:06, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That's one routine stats site, one two paragraph article on the player and one season summary for the country that mentions him in a couple of sentences. Where is GNG in that? Fenix down (talk) 03:55, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks .Here are some this ,this this and this among others in Georgian language.Anyway will leave it to the closer.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:18, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
So what do they say and how have you assured yourself that the sources are reliable since there are only two sites mentioned? Fenix down (talk) 07:22, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Per this ყოველდღიური სპორტული გაზეთი "ლელო" that is attributing this to Lelo .These are from Lelo Georgia's oldest sports newspaper [1] , [2][3] and [4] while this [5] is attributed to Azeri Sport.There are not routine coverage and are articles about him with his photograph in all articles.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:18, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
And like I said, what do they say? How do I know they aren't just routine match reports. I note nothing has been added to the article or using them. I'm not saying you haven't found significant coverage but you need to be able to articulate what the sources say. Fenix down (talk) 16:42, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The first URL appears to be a post-match interview, thus WP:ROUTINE; the second URL became malformed when posted, thus I cannot see what it says; the third URL appears to be a piece about Adamia maybe signing with a club, thus WP:ROUTINE; and the fourth URL appears to be a brief post-trade interview, thus WP:ROUTINE. — Jkudlick tcs 01:47, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for my delay in replying.None of them is strictly WP:routine I have added translation as requested and I have not included any post match interview and one is allowed to use foreign language sources and all of them are about him with his photograph in them .Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:55, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mr. Guye (talk) 04:24, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It is, except he has never played for the Georgian national team. Sir Sputnik (talk) 04:40, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
As for Sir Sputnik's behavior, I can't believe that, as the creator of this page, I wasn't notified of this discussion on my talk page. The statement "I have every reason to believe consensus is now possible" is also very telling. Your definition of "consensus" seems to mean your point of view, regardless of the views of the rest of the community. It is very difficult to assume good faith when this discussion is sneaked by like this.--BoguSlav 06:42, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Azerbaijan league IS FULLY PROFESSIONAL![edit]

This article states that the salaries of players in the league range from $5,000 to $66,000 a month. Another article states that the top 3 clubs in Azerbaijan have a yearly budget of more than $10 million. It also states that the highest paid players get around 600 euro a year. Another article says that professional players in the Azerbaijan league get salaries that are many times higher than those of the average Azerbaijani. These are just the first three articles I came across. I could very easily find a lot more. I'm waiting for the WP:BIASed editors to now tell me that this is not enough evidence because it is not in the Anglophone media or something to that effect.--BoguSlav 07:10, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The correct place to discuss whether the Azerbaijan League is fully professional is at WT:FPL. That said, I would be willing to recommend that this AfD be placed on hold pending discussion there. If consensus there is that the league is fully professional, then Adamia meets WP:NFOOTY and the article can be kept and improved. If not, then he doesn't and the article can be deleted. It seems obvious to me that this AfD is not going to reach any particular consensus until then. — Jkudlick tcs 08:24, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The professionality of Azerbaijani football can be discussed at WP:FPL, but there's no reason the discussion can't also take place here. We've certainly concluded a league is fully professional in a AFD before without any discussion at WP:FPL. Nfitz (talk) 03:29, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
And by "consensus" you mean that you hope more people will come around to your point of view to delete the article. You have also not responded at all to the points I have brought up. And we can discuss this issue anywhere it's necessary. Per Wikipedia:WikiProject, "WikiProjects are not rule-making organizations. WikiProjects have no special rights or privileges compared to other editors ". I do not need to ask for the approval of WikiProject Football regarding every football-related topic. A WikiProject is simply a group of editors focusing on a specific topic. However, even if we do go by the recommendations of WP:FOOTY, Giorgi Adamia is still notable because he does play in a fully professional league. --BoguSlav 02:46, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The argument of User:Boguslavmandzyuk is compelling. A source indicating the league minimum salary (at least of the top 18 players) would be useful. Nfitz (talk) 15:10, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.