The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:09, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gert Spaargaren[edit]

Gert Spaargaren (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has had a notability warning for 19 months and a references warning for 11 months with no improvement. The subject does not appear to pass WP:ACADEMIC. Pburka (talk) 14:44, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Did a search for sources in both English and Dutch, nothing substantial except for pages from Wageningen University itself. Pim Rijkee (talk) 16:03, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 21:26, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 21:27, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. It is also an unreferenced bio. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 00:02, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep with GS h index of 16 and some very high cites. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:56, 18 May 2011 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.