The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Gex (series). MBisanz ^talk 02:27, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gex (character)[edit]

This character does not establish notability independent of Gex (series) through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so the section in the main article is enough. TTN (talk) 20:23, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MuZemike (talk) 21:19, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Gex (series). Definitely a case where the character and series are synonymous; no reason for separate articles. Nifboy (talk) 00:09, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect In this case, the material in the main article is enough--there really isn't that much more to say, even though this is an iconic character for a major series.DGG (talk) 00:38, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - entirely in-universe, per WP:WAF. The parenthesis make this an unuseful redirect. The Gex dab page already provides a link to the game's article. Marasmusine (talk) 10:41, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 04:36, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.