The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Daniel 02:58, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sounds like someone advertising their own non-notable product (it includes statements written in the 1st person) -- MightyWarrior 23:08, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
keep there are only two mud clients that do what this product does: work in the same way on osx/linux/windows, the program is totally free and opensource, it's referenced in other wikipedia pages, I've fixed the "1st person statements" -- Gabry74 15:43, 28 September 2007 (UTC) 16:37, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No WP:RS. Gabry74's defences don't address the problems that still exist - Just because it does something unique doesn't mean it's WP:Notable and being FOSS and cross-platform is of absolutely no merit whatsoever. Also seems to be violate WP:COI -- M2Ys4U(talk) 18:30, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.