The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:01, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ghulam Rasool Kashmiri

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence meets notability criteria at WP:PEOPLE. Dougweller (talk) 13:37, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 20:15, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:53, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:53, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:53, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. No sources are apparent. Could article's supporters say what is basis for notability? Xxanthippe (talk) 23:29, 7 February 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Delete Usual gsearches didn't turn up anything, article itself has no apparent sourcing. Ray^Talk 21:02, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:08, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete then as no sources have appeared. Xxanthippe (talk) 05:27, 10 February 2011 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.