The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:27, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gigas (fantasy games)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is entirely WP:OR. There are no refs that prove that "Gigas" is anything but a cool sounding term. Most of the article is just a list of fancruft examples. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 08:31, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: As per WP:GNG and WP:NEXIST.Your welcome | Democratics ^Talk 08:42, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per both comments above. The article is pretty much entirely OR and WP:SYNTH, as the article creator seems to have just noticed that the word was used in multiple games, and cobbled the article together from that, with no sources. 64.183.45.226 (talk) 17:48, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, although this isn't even FANCRUFT, really. Just a collection of games that use a similar term. And that's one helluva disambiguation term. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 16:12, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.