The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:42, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Girly-pop[edit]

Girly-pop (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Original research with no reliable sources to show notability or existence JD554 (talk) 18:30, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge: To Pop music. --SkyWalker (talk) 18:36, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sources would need to be found for any of the claims that were merged before that would be possible. --JD554 (talk) 18:57, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Delete- there are a lot of google hits, but none of them are even remotely reliable sources (most are myspace pages and fansites), so I don't really know how it could be written in a verifiable way. I wouldn't merge it with Pop music as that article doesn't go into detail about any particular genre and this info would be out of place there.--Mars2035 (talk) 19:50, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. WesleyDodds (talk) 02:33, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. I was thinking about nomming this myself. indopug (talk) 04:19, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I've cut it down by removing all the unverified things - rather telling that there's only a few sentences left, and those that I did leave are also unverified. The article looks like something made up one day. Completely unverified, lacking in reliable sources, and fails the notability guideline. Seraphim♥ Whipp 16:26, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or Redirect to Pop music - I don't think a merge is worth it. As Seraphim says, it lacks any reliable sources, but as Mars2035 says, there are lots of Google hits (supporting a redirect). - tholly ^--Turnip-- 17:29, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I've been trying to get the article deleted from the very beginning. Its unverified nonsense.--SilverOrion (talk) 01:28, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I couldn't find any appropriate sources. Axl (talk) 13:52, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.