The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:10, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Giulliana Weston[edit]

Giulliana Weston (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable model. The claim that she has been photographed for multiple magazines is probably correct, but there are only a handful of non-Wikipedia Google-hits of her. I'm open to anyone who can provide evidence of notability from outside the Internet. YechielMan 02:02, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - fails WP:V. MER-C 06:06, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete ran a quick search on LexisNexis and Newsbank, but nothing came up. -SpuriousQ 12:26, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unless properly sourced i.a.w. WP:BIO by end of this AfD Alf photoman 15:39, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Keep she's very, very hot --TommyOliver 18:33, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Tommy, that's not a valid reason to keep her on Wikipedia. YechielMan 22:17, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • My friend, I'd keep her at my house if I could :P --TommyOliver 22:20, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.