The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:20, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Glanville Peiris[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. Ambassadors are not inherently notable. Unable to find any indepth coverage, the only independent reliable sources merely confirm that he was an ambassador. Dan arndt (talk) 12:21, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 12:25, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 12:25, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Myanmar-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 12:25, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 12:25, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete fails WP:BIO. as his time was decades ago, gbooks is better for search but all it reveals is one line mentions. Watch as the keep !voters recycle the "ambassador to a major country is inherently notable " argument. LibStar (talk) 13:49, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ambassadors are not default notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:55, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.