- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:42, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Glen Kamara (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PROD contested because supposed place has references, however, two references mean nothing to me. PROD was done as this article fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. ArsenalFan700 (talk) 17:41, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 17:45, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 17:47, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. JMHamo (talk) 17:49, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom. He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:01, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per above. Northern Antarctica (₵) 19:56, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - while the page itself is dreadful, it does link to the Finnish-language version of the page fi:Glen Kamara which is relatively well written and referenced. In particluar, one of the references there in particular [1] does meet the standard to establish notability; it addresses the topic (Glen Kamara) directly and in detail; it's reliable (in that there are 3 other articles also referenced in the same article confirming the facts); and there are multiple secondary sources; the sources are independent of the subject. Nfitz (talk) 23:03, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- There needs to be more than just a few though. Just because there are a few sources that would pass GNG does not mean this player passes GNG. I mean, I just looked him up on google and all I find are stat pages. Google News does not help his case either. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 23:25, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Google News only searches the last 4-5 weeks or so. Unfortunately, Google has changed Google News search so it doesn't find older material. I had no problem finding these articles, and others, using the regular Google Search ... try changing your search language to Finnish. Nfitz (talk) 23:46, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable. Enigmamsg 02:28, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Player has not played in fully professional league, nor played senior international football, so fails NFOOTY. No indication of any other achievements garnering significant reliable coverage to achieve GNG. SOurces noted above seem insufficient in number and length for GNG. Fenix down (talk) 08:55, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.