The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:10, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Goive[edit]

Goive (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Spam Cheesemaniam 16:53, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. No attribution of notability to credible independent sources. Fails WP:WEB. --Dhartung | Talk 18:45, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (possibly merging some content into Notions (Winchester College)) - Much as I would like "goive" (either the word or the website) to be considered notable enough for its own Wikipedia article, I don't think this point has been reached yet.Gingekerr 19:34, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete just 68 hits when searching Google for goive + proxy. None meet our requirements for WP:WEB and WP:RS. --A. B. ^(talk) 21:05, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unattributed and non-notable website. Carlosguitar 21:54, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.