The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 21:10, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Golden Book of World Records[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

does not meet wiki:notability, also fails miserably on wp:ref Shrikanthv (talk) 11:19, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There seems to be a trend of creating "world records" books or sites and letting people provide their own "records" to be listed. This is one of them. Basically, you fill out a form and send it in [1], and then you get approval. As these "records" may be cited in articles, the reliability of these sources should be clarified at Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard. LaMona (talk) 15:30, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 16:38, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 16:38, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I have added more news reference. Hope, It helped the article to get improved. I believe this article should not be deleted as several news references i have cited to the article. Thank you.--Jeeteshvaishya (talk) 11:32, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is part of a COIN I opened up earlier today, the refs are all local interest puff pieces about the recipients of these "records" not this book. And then there's random links provided to searches. I've cleaned up most of this from the article. —SpacemanSpiff 17:29, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no significant coverage of the work, fails WP:NWEB. The only review I found was this one in Hindi. --Bejnar (talk) 05:14, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.