The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:38, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GoodTools[edit]

(Find video game sources: "GoodTools" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)

Article is entirely supported by self-published information with no valid third-party sourcing, and also heavily violates WP:IINFO with a large amount of technical code bloat that basically have no context outside of the article. It could be redirected to ROM instead of outright deleted. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 19:21, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a non-notable application failing WP:GNG with no reliable independent in-depth sources, such as WP:VG/RS. Doesn't look like any sources have covered this to any depth. I see lots of forum posts and questions, but mostly in context of users interacting with it. Almost all of the article is either excessive detail or only supported by primary or unreliable sources. I don't really see any content for preserving. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 19:36, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Hellknowz. Also, because it is about ROMs, which have dubious copyright concern, we should expect an article that points to projects that are based on (even if they don't promote it) dubious copyright issues to have rather good sources to support it. (For example, ScummVM, while completely legal as a program, does require getting access to assets, but the program itself is well noted in references so that dubious nature can be overlooked). --Masem (t) 20:07, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Hellknowz. Nomader (talk) 21:28, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:49, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:49, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.