- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. czar 21:18, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Good Music for All[edit]
- Good Music for All (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can’t find any reliable independent sources to support this article. Fails WP:NCORP. Mccapra (talk) 14:47, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 15:52, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 15:52, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 15:52, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails for lack of WP:RS. Seems to be one of many similar companies. Bearian (talk) 20:38, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:NCORP which has very high standards, and this doesn't even scratch the "if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject" part, not even a bit. Nothing in my searches which is mostly about GOOD Music. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 17:01, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 20:41, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.