The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 14:58, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Googolplex (toy)[edit]

Googolplex (toy) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable topic, includes three references to books published by the manufacturing company of the toy itself and a patent filing, no secondary sources at all. Lordtobi (✉) 14:26, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:15, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete – Searches have provided no independent coverage of this toy; fails WP:GNG. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:16, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Almost no notable evidence of such a toy exists. 111.68.115.165 (talk) 05:24, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete- Not enough in-depth coverage to show it passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:50, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.