The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G12. Nishkid64 00:35, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Goosecross Cellars[edit]

Goosecross Cellars (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable winery that fails WP:CORP and reads like an advertisements. The article also fails WP:V with no sources (outside its own website). The Wine Project is tinkering with notability guidelines with the essay Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a wine guide but this is still currently just an essay. However, Goosecross Cellars have very little write ups about them apart from a purely advertising aspect ghits. In the wine world, these are very trivial writes up and does nothing to distinguish the winery from any other run of the mill winery. Just about any wine can get a review. In major wine publications like Wine Spectator and Wine Advocate and Decanter there is virtually nothing. Agne^Cheese/^Wine 08:19, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete winery fails WP:CORP in addition, according to their own fact sheet, 98% of their revenue is direct to consumer sales, which means that very few consumers are ever going to see a bottle of the wine outside of their winery. If their wines were on shelves coast to coast, I could look past the lack of press. However, without significant media mentions, it's not particularly notable. --- The Bethling (pronounced The Bethling) ^(Talk) 09:16, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Also, hello copyvio[1]. We could put the whole copyvio template on it, but I think it would be easier to suggest that an admin just delete it now. --Limegreen 19:47, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Agreed with both User:Bethling and User:Limegreen. --DrGaellon 22:30, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.