The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. W.marsh 15:49, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Govindbhai Dholakia[edit]

Govindbhai Dholakia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Makes no claim to significance — and he does indeed seem to be non-notable, being just another businessman. I deleted an earlier (much thinner) version, but as it's been recreated and exhaustively padded out, I thought that I'd bring it here. Mel Etitis (Talk) 13:59, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete just to make things clear. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 13:59, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-notable businessman. --Tainter 15:49, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The subject appears to be a minor notable figure in a few aspects of his life. In my opinion the culmination of these various aspects is that he is notable. John Vandenberg 16:24, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - fails WP:V and WP:RS, and the article reads like blatant promotion. Without prejudice against future recreation if WP:V and WP:RS are satisfied. Moreschi ^{Request a recording?} 19:48, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep- Seems to bew notable in some regards.Bakaman 03:12, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails WP:V and WP:RS. utcursch | talk 16:00, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• The following all placed here by 59.144.125.127 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
  • Keep. Govindbhai Dholakia seems to be notable person. He has done much for community and also for diamond industry, which is the top industry in Gujarat state, India.
  • Keep- He has to be here. Notable anyway.
  • Keep you ppl dont know him. I m from Gujarat state and I know Govindbhai is notable person and should be mentioned here....
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. John Vandenberg 12:48, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.