The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 04:47, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Grace (musical group)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN band. Someone declined the speedy because why. --Tagishsimon (talk) 07:49, 14 December 2016 (UTC) Tagishsimon (talk) 07:49, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:58, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:58, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Promotional article lacking independent, third party references. This entry seems to be another case of believing that existence equals notability. ShelbyMarion (talk) 12:44, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Non-notable band lacking non-trivial support. I do not understand why the A7 was removed - invalid reasoning was cited by the editor that removed it. reddogsix (talk) 03:43, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- My reasoning was perfectly valid, as below. Adam9007 (talk) 03:48, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into T. D. Jakes. Does not appear to be notable enough to warrant its own article. Adam9007 (talk) 03:47, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Clearly promotional, by a redlink editor who, judging from his or her edits overall, may be being paid to promote bands here. Can we include the stub Grace (Self-titled album) as part of this deletion discussion?--Tenebrae (talk) 04:22, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted that under CSD A9. MER-C 04:47, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There's two notable artists I know of called Grace, this isn't one of them. KaisaL (talk) 16:06, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.