The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 00:20, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Grand Champion (arcade game)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sources in the article appear unreliable or are entries in a list or database. I could not find significant coverage of the game in secondary reliable sources. Delete per WP:GNG. Odie5533 (talk) 06:26, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley 00:06, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:EXISTS, but not notable. 1292simon (talk) 02:21, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 22:06, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:06, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 00:17, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 01:11, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Electronic Games published a short (two paragraph) game review in August 1982. Not sufficient to satisfy WP:GNG yet, but it's probable that further research into arcade gaming magazines published in 1981 and 1982 would uncover further coverage of the game. --Mike Agricola (talk) 19:52, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- If enough reviews are found in the future to meet the GNG, I would be fine with the article being taken to WP:DRV. --Odie5533 (talk) 00:55, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Appears to lack sufficient notability for an article. --Michig (talk) 08:18, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.