The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist 09:30, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Grand Pro Wrestling[edit]

Grand Pro Wrestling (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable wrestling promotion, relies on dubious (and primary) sources. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:57, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Nikki♥311 17:22, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Nikki♥311 17:22, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Receives regular coverage from Wrestling Observer Newsletter and other WP:PW/RS sources.[1]LM2000 (talk) 07:35, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep This promotion is covered by reliable sources. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 12:42, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Per above.★Trekker (talk) 23:35, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.