The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:51, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Graysian theory[edit]

Non-notable and possibly non-existent. This purports to be an economics theory devised by a high school economics teacher and onetime political candidate. The book mentioned, Studies in Economics and Business, appears to be a series of study guides. Koppas (talk) 19:37, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as not notable. No independent source cited, nothing in Google Scholar, only WP mirrors in Google. JohnCD (talk) 19:44, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per lack of any reliable sources, which can be further demonstrated using Google Books, which only returns an issue of Penthouse Magazine that does not appear to have anything to do with the article's subject. (I would also like to note that the article appears to be mostly a Coatrack for a biography of the economist who created the theory, who may be notable due to his political career.--Unscented (talk) 19:55, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete on the basis of research by Unscented and JohnCD and the nominator Koppas. Non-notable. Drawn Some (talk) 20:01, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per everyone. Clearly non-notable. Edward321 (talk) 13:47, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.