The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus that the article isn't notable, especially on grounds of sourcing. The position of "listed/recognised/should have" really should be hashed out at NPOL, but in any case the consensus would be delete, even if all arguments are included Nosebagbear (talk) 14:05, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Green Party of Tennessee[edit]

Green Party of Tennessee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable state branch of a notable national party. Toa Nidhiki05 12:31, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Tennessee. Shellwood (talk) 12:44, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as it isn't a recognized party in Tennessee. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 00:34, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - We should keep every state green party article. GoodDay (talk) 03:20, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete articles need to be based on sources that are indepdent of the organization, secondary, and provide indepth coverage. None of the sources here are such.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:32, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.