The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:56, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Green printing

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Basically an essay on a concept that's not much of an encyclopedic topic. Drmies (talk) 22:41, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 07:29, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 07:35, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This was the fifth attempt by the "E-commerce Marketing Team Lead / PPC & SEO" of a print cartridge refill company to create a spammy fork of the existing articles that cover cartridge refill, and where the previous four attempts were redirected: toner refill, ink cartridge#Refills and third party replacements, and toner cartridge. Doesn't quite qualify for db-a10, but WP:NOTESSAY, WP:ADMASK, WP:REDUNDANTFORK and WP:POVFORK apply. The Mighty Glen (talk) 07:46, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It is a fork. Szzuk (talk) 21:11, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No an encyclopedic article but a essay piece WP:NOTESSAY and WP:REDUNDANTFORK . CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:08, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.