The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Listed for 21 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. I'm going to enterpret Johnbod's comment as a "weak keep". Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:01, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Greenmuseum.org[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly fails WP:WEB with no reliable, third-party sources found after some inquiry. Jay-Sebastos (talk) 05:00, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. —-- Alan Liefting (talk) - 22:00, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:06, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm! seems pretty new, but has some respectable donors, & decent content. I'm reluctant to slam down the hammer just now. Johnbod (talk) 02:12, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think there is a possibility to compile a good information about this interesting art/environmental project, see [1], [2], [3], [4]. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 08:20, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:50, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.