The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Chick Bowen 20:04, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Guacaherbert[edit]

Sorry about that. I entered the local nickname for it instead of the actual Common Name. Jegnome^talk _con 00:04, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A Google search of the name (Here) pulls up zero hits. I'm guessing the name is either spelled horribly wrong, or this is a joke. If anybody knows a correct spelling, please move the page. Thanks, Hojimachong^talk _con 00:04, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 20:21, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:V. The article gives the binomial species name "Microtus Guacaherbert"; there is no indication anywhere online that this species has been described. The Microtus article suggests no plausible misspellings. I smell a hoax. --Hyperbole 21:38, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. All of Jegnome (talk · contribs)'s contributions appear to be hoaxes. Sadly they do not seem to meet the criteria for speedy deletion. —David Eppstein 01:25, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. Not referred to in comprehensive listings of Microtus species, subspecies, and junior synonyms in Mammal Species of the World. --Aranae 07:38, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.