The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:40, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Guri Melby[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failed political candidate (she was not elected). Other than that she is just a local politician. Geschichte (talk) 18:57, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Being a local politician is insufficient WP:N. Pburka (talk) 19:38, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdrawing my vote, given User:Arsenikk's sources. Pburka (talk) 21:59, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:15, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, a news search with Kvasir finds at least this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this and this. There is more, but I couldn't bother to continue to search. This massive amount of media coverage (all less than six months old) shows that she clearly meets the criteria for significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources, and also shows how top candidates who fail to be elected usually have ample media coverage for notability. Arsenikk ^(talk) 20:57, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep per sources. Alison22 (talk) 00:14, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sock !vote struck. Tim Song (talk) 22:55, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Thank you for the diligent research as done by Arsenikk (talk · contribs). Cirt (talk) 14:15, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:07, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - as evidenced above plenty of good sources are available. 161 GNews hits in all, very few of which are false positives. --ThaddeusB (talk) 04:31, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and Expand - appears to be a plentiful amount of material to work with. This article should be expanded, considering how many sources there appear to be. Cocytus [»talk«] 13:46, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.