The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deor (talk) 11:28, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gustavo Pereira de Lima[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod as the creator attempted to find more sources about the player. Whilst some have been found indicating a disciplinary issue, which i do not think is sufficient enough for GNG on its own, the simple fact is that this is a player who has not played a single minute in a fully professional league, nor made a senior international appearance and so fails WP:NFOOTY. Currently, he has played one match in a non-fully pro state league and is on loan at a club where he could not make a fully pro appearance in any case. I have no problem with the article being recreated if the player does anythign to satisfy NFOOTY or does something else worthy of GNG, but at the moment, his disciplinary issues and his loan means this is unlikely and a case of WP:TOOSOON. Fenix down (talk) 17:53, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Fenix down (talk) 17:55, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 18:01, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - Most of the coverage of this player involves incidents of alleged doping and injuring an opponent. If he had played in the Campeonato Gaúcho or made some notable achievements with a senior football team, I might give the coverage more weight. Jogurney (talk) 20:01, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I think we should take a decision about the Gaucho Division status, because LucaG. says that Gaucho championship is professional and he provided some sources.Also he created many pages according to GAUCHO caps and we must take a decision.

Fully Pro:Yes or no? --Lglukgl (talk) 23:05, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - He didn't even played in Campeonato Gaúcho guys, only appeared in one Campeonato Alagoano match (which is pretty much semi-pro). The only fully-pro State Leagues in Brazil are Campeonato Paulista, Campeonato Gaúcho, Campeonato Carioca and Campeonato Paranaense (not so sure about the latter two though). MYS77 ^✉ 23:13, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - It should be noted that Paulista is the only state league where there is current consensus that it is a fully professional league per WP:FPL, so the above comment is incorrect. Fenix down (talk) 10:13, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - According to current guidelines, I agree with the deletion. But I still keep my discussion about the Brazilian state leagues are WP:FPL. Lucas Gaúcho (talk) 20:26, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.