The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ✗plicit 12:56, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The gbook reference would have swung it for me, but it looks industry publication at 84 pages, more a booklet. The rest breeding, cattle, and testifying in congress are neither unique nor particularly uncommon. To me he looks like a local farmer, later coal miner and later who tried to become a politician and failed. The references don't support NPOL nor [{WP:BIO]]. scope_creepTalk 15:47, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Although he didn't win anything, it's evident he was a major force in Idaho politics for approximately 15 years in the early 20th Century. Oh No! It's Faustus37!it is what it is - speak at the tone 03:39, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Enos733 and Eastmain. Passes GNG.4meter4 (talk) 03:40, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.