The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 09:59, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

H. de Winton and J. C. Thring[edit]

AfDs for this article:

Articles for deletion/H. de Winton and J. C. Thring

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article for two persons. Move any relevant cited material to individual articles Henry de Winton or John Charles Thring Grover cleveland (talk) 01:42, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 21:54, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 21:54, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 21:54, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge (without leaving redirect) relevant content to the articles on the two individuals. My guess is that their rules were very important as precursors to Association Football rules, but we have a full article on the subject at Cambridge Rules. Apart from their involvement in this, the two are largely NN, though being Archdeacon of Brecon may be on the fringes of notability. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:42, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No need for a redirect obviously. I don't see much worth merging from here. John Charles Thring is better developed than this. and Cambridge rules already covers (at length) the 1848 content relevant to Winton (and Winton already contains everything mergeable from this particular article relevant to him). Thus - as the content is already at the (multitude) of relevant targets, a redirect here doesn't make much sense - delete. Icewhiz (talk) 07:30, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 13:31, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Icewhiz, no need to redirect. Giant Snowman 13:34, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no need for a joint article on the two men when they have individual articles and the only notable thing they did together is already covered at a more appropriate place...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:15, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.