The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Non-notable record label seicer | talk | contribs 18:13, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HHN Records

Unsourced, non-notable/start-up record label. Prod removed by creator without comment or alteration.
I am also nominating the following related pages because they are respectively a non-notable artist on the label, his EP, and an unreleased album from another non-notable artist:

Delete all HHN Records non notable label. fails WP:CORP. lacks secondary sources. Chuck Vorhies fails WP:MUSIC. lacks secondary sources. lacks releases, awards, airplay. Bigger Than You unreleased album from non notable artist. fails WP:MUSIC. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bayou tsunami Ep The Bayou tsunami Ep was already nominated. article creater removed the AfD message. delete album of non notable artist. Duffbeerforme (talk) 10:03, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cmt. Blimey, missed that prior AfD. well spotted etc. tomasz. 10:14, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:09, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:10, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:11, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all Fails WP:N. Spec ial K 13:29, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per Duffbeerforme. - Basement12 (T.C) 13:51, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all as they aren't notable. Tavix (talk) 01:21, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
tomasz never gave a reason why, only thing they said was "non-notable/start-up record label". That's not a reason. The Prod said, If I didn't feel it was not justifiable I could remove the notice, which I did. On the External area of the HHN Records article, there are three links to official pages of HHN Records. Offical website, Imeem page, and myspace. Plus, I just added two links to the reference area.GhostDog21 10:06, 4, September 2008 (UTC)
- Subjects should be notable for inclusion in Wikipedia, and non-notable IS a reason for removal. The article needs to cite WP:RELIABLE published sources independent of HHN. Self-published sources like MySpace and blogs are not acceptable. As for the references you supplied, the charts is self-published and 2 sources are copies of each other, mentioning HHN in passing. Their independence is questionable. • Gene93k (talk) 05:35, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Gene93k, Those charts were not published by HHN Records. The charts were pubishled by music media outlets that are not affiliated with the label. Which makes those charts published sources independent of HHN. Also, on the Chuck Vorhies article I added a link to the reference area, which leads to a published source independent of the artist and label. GhostDog21 09:46, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all as none meet the notability requirements. Nuttah (talk) 17:12, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per my comments above. The label fails WP:CORP, the artist fails WP:BIO, and the works fail WP:MUSIC for lack of WP:RS. • Gene93k (talk) 18:04, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.