- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:45, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hala Khalaf[edit]
- Hala Khalaf (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Entirely promotional Rathfelder (talk) 20:21, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:34, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:34, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:34, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:34, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete She is a free lance journalist for whom there is no indication of significant impact.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:04, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:36, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep but with some heavy editing to remove the promotional language, and adding some sources to substantiate the only notable things in the article: that she won a prize for her journalism and that she published a book about diabetes. If there's anything else in her career that's notable then it should be included (definitely not her opinion on Arab hospitality!) but there's no need to delete when paring back will do. TrickyH (talk) 23:28, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:24, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - this seems to be self-promotion. No authoritative references are provided.--Rpclod (talk) 02:48, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not finding much on searches, she's young, so it;s may simply be WP:TOOSOON.E.M.Gregory (talk) 23:21, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- searches do not bring up anything substantial. The subject was a contributor to the book Voices of Diabetes but that's about it. WP:TooSoon may apply. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:08, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails GNG. This article is purely promotional and has no encyclopedia value. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 05:52, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.