The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 00:38, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Halifax Amateurs FC[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Inadequately sourced article about an amateur football club. I was only able to find one source that makes a passing mention about the club. Fails WP:ORGDEPTH. - Mr X 00:28, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agreed with nominator, there is a website with information about them but they don't meet WP:GNG LethalFlower^Talk/Reply 00:32, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Mr RD (talk) 09:53, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Mr RD (talk) 09:54, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sources have been added, further ones to come once I am given their direct link. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rinkydink84 (talk • contribs) 16:31, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - very low-level amateur team. The general consensus for base club notability is that they must have played in a national league / cup competition, which I do not believe this club has. Fenix down (talk) 14:59, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - way way way below the level at which teams are deemed notable, fails all relevant policies/guidelines -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:49, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 17:53, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - article has not fixed the issues that caused it to be A7d last week. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 16:28, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY- will never be notable enough. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:01, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.