- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Redirects can be created as necessary. – sgeureka t•c 15:33, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Hamatula (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable D&D topic. TTN (talk) 12:53, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 12:53, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 12:53, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:01, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or merge to List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 2nd edition monsters. BOZ (talk) 00:04, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Searching for sources, under both the Hamatula name as well as the alternative "Barbed Devil", brings up nothing but the usual mixture of primary and fan sources. There are no reliable, secondary sources that discuss the creature in any length that would denote notability. Rorshacma (talk) 15:54, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ceethekreator (talk) 21:17, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.