The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) sst✈ 03:34, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hardcore Lives[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Self-promotional and otherwise non-notable recording. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:25, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 15:40, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I was fully expecting to vote delete on this, but I was able to find a pile of reviews - unanimously positive ones, too - and interviews from a variety of websites. This isn't my kind of thing and I'm not necessarily qualified to assess how reliable as sources these are, but then again, you wouldn't expect to get New York Times and Rolling Stone reviews for this kind of band. The fact that I was able in five minutes to find five positive reviews makes me think this is as much a keep as any album in this genre is likely to be. Blythwood (talk) 22:15, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I found a lot of reviews, but none from reliable sources. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:32, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Notable artist, album has plenty of articles on many different music websites, and has enough coverage to have an article about it. No need to delete. TheSickBehemoth (talk) 22:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @TheSickBehemoth: Are you serious? Not all works by notable artists are notable. Show some RSes that support the notability of this recording. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:13, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The sources currently present in the article strike me as enough to meet the WP:GNG - dedicated articles by Blabbermouth, Loudwire, and Alt Press. I think the nominator is setting the bar a little too high in this case. Sergecross73 msg me 20:21, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:51, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.