The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Not sure why this was renominated. Clear consensus to keep very recently with multiple international sources provided. No indication this discussion will produce a different outcome. Fenix down (talk) 09:57, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hashtag United F.C.[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominated 3 months for concerns about it simply being a local YouTube-active team and no signs for actually satisfying the applicable footballers notability which is how we base these subjects, and even GNG itself as the sources are simply local news stories and announcements. As always, simply because it was considered for keep, it's enough time for improvements, even minimal ones, to be made and none happened. SwisterTwister talk 20:32, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:57, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - clear failure of football-related notability, but surprisingly meets GNG based on articles like these (non-local and in-depth): [1][2][3] —Мандичка^YO 😜 04:30, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:00, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:03, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Keep – Meets Wikipedia's General notability guideline per available sources, which are not local; several have national distribution. As such, WP:AUD is also met. See sources below and descriptions of those sources (bold emphasis mine). If a topic meets GNG, whether or not it meets a subject-specific notability guideline (also referred to as secondary notability guidelines) is generally moot.

Also, topic notability is not based upon whether or not articles are improved or not. For additional information regarding this reasoning, see WP:NOEFFORT. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:14, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

The Telegraph – "The Daily Telegraph, commonly referred to simply as The Telegraph, is a national British daily broadsheet newspaper..."
BBC Sport – "BBC Sport is a department of the BBC North division providing national sports coverage for BBC Television, radio and online."
L'Équipe – "...a French nationwide daily newspaper devoted to sport..."
BBC Mundo – "...part of the BBC World Service's foreign language output...", "... bbcmundo.com had over 8.5 million monthly unique visitors who read its stories...", "The BBC World Service is the world's largest international broadcaster..."

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 22:05, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - meets GNG. Not sure what's changed since the last comprehensive AFD... Giant Snowman 22:30, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.