The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:47, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hasq[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No apparent assertions of notability, article reads like an ad in places, and some of the material looks like it may have been lifted and slightly tweaked from someplace on the net. On top of all that this reads somewhat like a how-to guide. I am there fore listing this here for community input on the article's fate. TomStar81 (Talk) 06:51, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A how-to and a promo for a new crypto-scheme. Hey, I hear that money is just a matter of belief, man. This seems like a lodging for someone's boosting. Hithladaeus (talk) 12:16, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:22, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:22, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:23, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. New uncited research, WP:TOOSOON. The company or website founded to commercialize (or whatever the open-source equivalent might be) this technology, hasq.org, also appears to be non-notable. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:41, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.