The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. (non-admin closure) Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:43, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Heather Gross[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO. Non-notable person. Not subject to significant coverage from reliable independent sources. The1337gamer (talk) 08:52, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. The1337gamer (talk) 08:52, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. The1337gamer (talk) 08:53, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - There is no evidence that this person meets notability guidelines for artists. Clawsyclaw (talk) 10:31, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:55, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Redirect to Oxenfree#Development. I can't find any sources, so ~~I think redirecting to the game she helped work on would be the best idea.~~ Otherwise, delete. -- Anarchyte (work | talk) 13:29, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure redirecting to the Oxenfree is particularly useful. The article has one short sentence on her. In the future, if she becomes known for working on other projects, then a redirect to one of them over another wouldn't be helpful. I considered redirecting to the studio she works for (Night School Studio), which I think would be a better target but that article doesn't mention her outside the infobox. So I think deletion would be better. --The1337gamer (talk) 14:40, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fair point. I've changed my !vote to delete. Guess we'll have to wait until she's done more work before an article at all is viable. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:33, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As the person who wrote the article, I agree. While her work on the art for Oxenfree certainly is notable there isn't enough notable information and sources to make an article, believe me, I looked for them. I will keep what I wrote here in my sandbox as a draft, add information when more is available, and recreate it once there are enough secondary sources and content. FlagFlayer 00:04, 16 April 2017 (U:TC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:23, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, I've placed a ((db-author)) tag on the article, which may speed things along. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:05, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.