The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Hebron massacre. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 22:04, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hebron massacres[edit]

Hebron massacres (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page violates numerous parts of the disambiguation guidelines. Accordingly I have set up a MOS:DAB-compliant version at Hebron massacre (the correct title for a dab page in this case). Note that the purpose of a dab page is to direct the reader to the correct page, nothing more. Anything contentious or disputed, or where sources differ, should be dealt with in the target article(s) and not on the dab page. This page should simply be deleted. NSH001 (talk) 13:29, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Hebron massacre. Presumably there's no article on the 2002 incident. Josh Parris 14:10, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. —JHunterJ (talk) 14:39, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Move back to Hebron massacre for the reason Josh Parris gives, but move instead of redirect to preserve history (and then clean up to the current version of Hebron massacre) -- JHunterJ (talk) 14:39, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

comment I'd be happy with that (tho' I think losing the history would be no great loss) --NSH001 (talk) 17:20, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect A redirect keeps the history intact too and avoids all the trouble moves cause. The new version has too little in common with this anyone to require any attribution. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:10, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  A redirect would leave the history of the one disambiguation page segmented in the histories of two pages. I am unaware of "all the trouble" moves cause, but will be happy to perform the moves and history merges myself, if this is so closed. -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:59, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.