The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.--Wizardman 00:03, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
An extra source is added + Alexa information Kalvitz 16:39, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment And reverted, because the Alexa information given was incorrect by a factor of five. [1]RGTraynor 17:17, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm not sure that I can consider Search Engine Journal to be very reliable for a source. --Dennisthe2 18:06, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The Alexa rank number was correct; it referred to the site's rank in the US. Kalvitz 01:23, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Can you accept Red Herring as a source then? [2]. That article has a quote from a Research Director from Gartner. They have several other sources listed on [3] Kalvitz 01:23, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The Red Herring article reads like a press release, and the number 3 link you list is directly on helium.com - the use of which falls outside of our reliable source guidelines. --Dennisthe2 03:38, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There apear to be a number of other sources online that have mentioned Helium. Alexa shows links from CNET, TechCrunch and ABCnews, as well as a vast number of bloggers. It also looks like they were invited to speak at DEMO 2007. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.92.43.9 (talk) 22:40, 22 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]
Delete: as per everybody --User:Ahadland1234 23:03, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.