The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. King of ♠ 05:11, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hellas On-Line[edit]

Hellas On-Line (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Delete No WP:RS, does not assert WP:N, not notable- just another ISP. Bstone (talk) 22:10, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think this article belongs on the Greek wikipedia. As well, just because another similar group has an article does not mean that this one should have one. There are still no WP:RS and this group fails the WP:N threshold. Bstone (talk) 22:54, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I strongly disagree deleting articles based on their "geographical" content. What about the Otenet article? Should that be moved as well as it belongs to the Greek ISP category? Again, finding reliable resoures in English is not possible as with many wikipedia articles. Walnutjk (talk) 23:04, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If the subject is notable in Greece then it's notable enough for English Wikipedia. This is an encyclopedia about the whole world universe written in English, not an encyclopedia about English-speaking countries. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:47, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If there are no equivalent English-language sources available then Greek ones are fine. Please add any that you have to the article. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:47, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.