The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:52, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hellflower[edit]

Hellflower (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted article about a band of questionable notability. With the exception of one news story from this week about recording an album, all provided sources are primary references. No serious indications of notability yet. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 16:57, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unless it can be fleshed out. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 18:34, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:54, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not notable. Jarkeld (talk) 13:19, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no evidence of touring or any other factor for WP:BAND. Will change mind for sources. Bearian (talk) 13:59, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete does not assert notability, I can't believe the speedy was declined... Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 05:39, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.