The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of characters in The Railway Series. I'm suggesting y'all discuss or try to merge whatever information you think is merge-worthy. Doesn't have to be the article I suggested here. Then you can just redirect when you're done. Thanks everyone....this train has left the station. Missvain (talk) 02:15, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Henry the Green Engine[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article about a single fictional locomotive within the world of Thomas the Tank Engine. The article was created in 2004, since when it has remained without proper sources. It is written in a decidedly inappropriate tone, much of it from a fan perspective. It confuses real-world and fictional perspectives, mixes two different versions of the same character - one from the books, one from the related but separate TV series - leaving the text impossibly confused. Worse, after applying WP:BEFORE research, the subject of this article is not covered in multiple reliable, published sources, and is not notable. A proposal was made to merge the salvageable contents into List of characters in The Railway Series, but this was rejected on the talk page. I don't believe there is a justification for keeping this as a separate article on Wikipedia Laplorfill (talk) 22:21, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:14, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:16, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The proposal that was made to merge this information into List of characters in The Railway Series was rejected by only one user. This article contains two sets of information. Half the article could and should be moved to the Henry section of List of characters in The Railway Series. The other half should go to List of Thomas & Friends characters. Unfortunately that article is simply a bare list of names.

I oppose deletion on two grounds

Notability. Whilst only appealing to a small audience there is serious interest as shown by the following web site https://ttte.fandom.com/wiki/Henry_the_Green_Engine
Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia. There is a place for minority interest articles.

One of the objections to the article was the lack of citations. This has been partially addressed. OrewaTel (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No evidence of notability like the rest of the characters from the series, through this one at least attempts to discuss some controversies related to two episodes the character appears in. However, the controversies are related to the episodes and not really to this character, so if sources are found (one of the sections has no sources), the odds are they won't be of much help, but do ping me if you think otherwise. The best I can see here for salvaging is that if said sources are found, maybe the mentioned episodes could get stand-alone articles? Regarding the proposed merge, there is little to merge as most of the article is still unreferenced plot summary aka WP:FANCRUFT, through I have no major objections to a merger if anyone wants to carry it out (just don't dump irrelevant info in a list). _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:24, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This article dates back to 2004, 2 years before Wikipedia started to develop notability guidelines for fictional things and back when Wikipedia was drowning in fancruft. We have since realized that Wikipedia needs to require things to be notable, which Henry is not.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the above analysis. Unless more sources are presented, this fails WP:GNG. I'd recommend that if the Fandom is insufficient to ask an admin to temporarily restore any deleted page history so it can be transwiki'd. TTN (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per everyone above. Surprised though that there are no reliable sources available since Henry is a main character. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 19:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I can’t believe the Thomas deletionists are still at it. Henry is notorious for being bricked up in the tunnel and that is alone he is part of popular culture not to mention the several other plot lines that he was notable for. Special Coal and Henry’s Forest (in which a tv documentary featured a complaint from Rev Awdry himself) are easily notable. 94.175.6.205 (talk) 15:53, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge if possible. There is some information here to preserve. Some of it is about the story that Henry appears in and not on topic. But the Washington Post article does cover some interesting facts about Henry. I agree this isn't enough to establish notability but it is worth WP:PRESERVING. Archrogue (talk) 00:24, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Archrogue. Notoability is not inherited, but preservation of sources and information are always welcome. Bearian (talk) 21:32, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.