The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 01:45, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

HighStage[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable product article lacking independent reliable sources showing notability. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:46, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:26, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:26, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as reads more like an ad. –Davey2010 • (talk) 19:57, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above - it's an ambiguously promotional article. Fevrret (talk) 21:08, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - software article of unclear notability, lacking references to significant coverage in reliable sources. A search did not turn up any RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 21:30, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.