The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete g10, unsourced attack page, author blocked for trolling (see his contribs). NawlinWiki 01:49, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hilary Duff child abuse scandal[edit]

Hilary Duff child abuse scandal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)

Since no-one wanted this, it's for you to decide.... noteworthy or not?? but this is fact not fiction SimonRebbsell1 01:26, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Delete Speedy Delete- Until the author can source it. Per BLP and the siegenthaler incident, we can't make unreferenced claims about child abuse or so forth without sources. However, hoax is not a speedy criterion, it's not really an attack page, and a prod would be resisted by the author. Might as well put it up here. Speedy per G10. "This includes a biography of a living person that is negative in tone and unsourced, where there is no NPOV version in the history to revert to."--Wooty Woot? contribs 01:32, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Notable per GCap Media mentions over recent weeks: numerous controversy on BRMB and Beacon Radio.

Hell, ask Q103 about the scandal... well, I do work for GCap radio! --SimonRebbsell1 01:31, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete As extremely prejudicial unsourced information. janejellyroll 01:32, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Speedy Delete - Um, so let me get this straight? Both Hilary Duff and Kelly Clarkson are being charged for child abuse for a 15 year old boy in a small town in England? Um, sorry. Unless you can verify both, I'm voting delete per WP:HOAX.--theblueflamingo^Speak 01:34, 23 January 2007 (UTC) P.S. WP:COI number 1 states "avoid editing articles related to your organization or its competitors", which is a guideline, so if it is true, you should try to remain neutral. -theblueflamingo^Speak 01:34, 23 January 2007 (UTC) changing vote to speedy. Fails CSD G10. --theblueflamingo^Speak 01:45, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep this, GCap Media have tons of sources about it. It's no conflict of interest.

Ask any presenter at:

1. 96.4 brmb
2. wyvernfm
3. powerfm
4. southernfm
5. capitalradio
6. foxfm

i work for GCap and know this! so there, no conflict of interest! --SimonRebbsell1 01:36, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• KEEP FOR THE LAST TIME!!! GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!!! BLP IS A FUCKING JOKE ARE YOU AL CAPONE! --SimonRebbsell1 01:40, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.